Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8640 13
Original file (NR8640 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
_ DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

701 $, COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490

 

BAN
Docket No:NROQ8640-13
11 March 2014

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records

 

To: Secretary of the Navy
Subj:
iia?
Ref: - (a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552
Encl: {1) DD Form 149 w/attachments

(2) -Navy Personnel Command (NPC) memo 1430 Ser 811/038
of 27 Jan 2014

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed
enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the
applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was
advanced to E-4/STS3 from the March 2011 Navy-wide advancement
exam.

2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Ruskin and

George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice
on 10 March 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined
that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on

the available evidence of record. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval
records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record
pertaining to Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice,
finds as follows:

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and
regulations within the Department of the Navy.

b. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office
having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in
Petitioner’s application has commented to the effect that the
request has merit and warrants favorable action.

CONCLUSION

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board
finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following
corrective action.
RECOMMENDATION :

That Petitioner's naval record be corrected, where appropriate,
as follows:

a. Petitioner was advanced to E-4/STS3 from the March 2011
Navy-wide advancement exam with an effective date of Wy

Wa ich a Time In Rate date of QP

Note: Due to the above correction, Petitioner was eligible to
participate in the September 2012 E-5 exam. However, since the
- correction was not yet made, he was unable to participate in the
exam. Therefore, he participated in the March 2013 E-5 exam and
was selected for advancement. The March 2013 exam was then
compared to the previous September 2012 exam but his final
multiple was less than the minimum multiple required.

b. That a copy of this Report of Proceedings be filed in
Petitioner's naval record.

4, ‘Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the
Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal
Regulations, Section 723.6(c}) it is certified that quorum was
present at the Board's review and deliberations, and that the
foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board’s
proceedings in the above entitied matter.

diate

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN BRONTE I. MONTGOMERY

Recorder Acting Recorder
5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section

6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6 ({e))
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the
authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on
behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.

11 March 2014 “2 AN F
¥ eS,

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Acting Executive Director

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4748-13

    Original file (NR4748-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that she was advanced to E-4/HT3 from the March 2011 Navy-wide advancement exam cycle. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 3 September 2013, and, pursuant to its reguiations, determined that the partial corrective action indicated below...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1089 14

    Original file (NR1089 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 8. Pursuant to the provisions of reference {a} Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-4/EN3 from the March 2012 Navy-wide advancement examination. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Ruskin and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 14 April 2014 and, pursuant to its...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0500 14

    Original file (NR0500 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that she advanced to E-4/1T3 from the September 2012 Navy-wide advancement exam. If the score received mects or exceeds the score that was previously required for advancement, Petitioner may reapply to this Board for consideration of advancement to E-5 retroactive to the date Petitioner would have been advanced on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0322 14

    Original file (NR0322 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-6/ETl from the September 2012 Navy-wide advancement examination. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Ruskin and George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 24 March 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR9380 13

    Original file (NR9380 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he was advanced to IT2/E5 from the September 2012 Navy-wide advancement exam. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Ruskin and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 4 August 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 02547-09

    Original file (02547-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to B-4/STS3, when first eligible in March 2008. 2, The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 23 June 2009 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3376 14

    Original file (NR3376 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    1552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) Navy Personnel Command (NPC) memo 1430 Ser 811/085 of 13 Mar 2014 1, Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-4/AT3 from the March 2013 Navy-wide advancement examination. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Exnicios and George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0167 14

    Original file (NR0167 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 5S. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-5/HM2 from the March 2012 Navy-wide advancement examination. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Exnicios and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 7 April 2014 and, pursuant to its...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2740 14

    Original file (NR2740 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure {1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he was advanced from the September 2012 Navy-wide advancement exam. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Ruskin and Exnicios reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 21 July 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4193 14

    Original file (NR4193 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that his Time in Rate to E-5/MM2 be restored to March 2011 and that he was authorized to take the March 2014 E-6/JIM1 advancement examination. The Board, cons .sting of Ms. Davis, Ms. Wilcher and Mr. Grover reviewed Petitioner|s allegations of error and injustice on 15 July 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined...